Trains, Infrastructure, Borderlands

Two separate newspaper articles about cost-cutting, revenue increases, and efficiency on trains caught my attention recently. There was one on the loss of the platzkart, the third-class sleeper car on Russian trains, and another on the loss of the pantry car on Indian trains. This, paired with more cuts on other long-distance services, such as the night train from Amsterdam to Copenhagen that my partner and I always wanted to take, I headed over to the news section of one of my favorite train travel sites, The Man in Seat 61, who is the guru of all things train-related. It’s not all doom and gloom; there are reports of a Peru route being reinstated, Vietnamese Railways introducing online bookings, Ljubljana-Venice reopening. It would be nice if someone could do a time lapse map of all these route openings, closings, and re-openings.

Speaking of transport, logistics, and capital, I’ve been completely mesmerized by Charmaine Chua’s fabulous container ship ethnography blog series. Also, Cultural Anthropology (happily Open Access now) has put up all sorts of pieces on writing about and researching infrastructure, so I feel like my latest interests are moving with the times. I’m also seeing so many great CFPs for infrastructure and borders (as well as infrastructure and temporality) panels at the upcoming AAG 2016. Unfortunately, it’s in the middle of a massive teaching load for me next year, so I can’t attend. Someone report back for me, please.

Our next (already the 5th!) Asian Borderlands Conference (theme: Dynamic Borderlands: Livelihoods, Communities, and Flows) will be held in Kathmandu, Nepal on 12-14 December 2016, in conjunction with Social Science Baha, a fine organisation that has done a lot for critical social science in Nepal over the past few years. I haven’t returned since the earthquake, but have been in touch with several colleagues and friends — these have been intense and trying times for many. The latest border/geopolitical news, as explained in this Washington Post article, involves a new (discriminatory) constitution, blockades at the southern border with India, fuel shortages as a consequence, and questions about the future role of the Kyirong (Tibet-Nepal) border reopening.

Autumn Update 2014

It’s autumn and the three of us have colds. I’m sitting here listening to my coughing almost-six-month old through the baby monitor, amazed at how extraordinarily different my life was just a few months ago. I’m looking forward to the adventures that lie ahead, like showing him the aquarium or putting him on the front of my bicycle while we cycle to daycare. The first few months were truly difficult, perhaps partly because I’m not used to *not* getting at least a couple of things done each day. The thing that began to make it better – besides of course the slow disappearance of what was supposedly colic and sleeping more than 3 hours at night – was a conversation with another new academic mother who introduced me to the term “mothering worker” (as opposed to working mother) from Gabrielle Hosein’s excellent blog, Diary of a Mothering Worker. It fits, it feels right. I have the routine down now, we go to daycare together in the morning and I hop on my bike and head to the office. Reverse the procedure on the way home. But the poor thing is now ill, so I guess that’s it for the routine for the time being. But we’re all learning, and the term “kinderziektes” (childhood illnesses/teething) makes sense…

…in two senses. In July, our department moved to a new building. We used to be in the Spinhuis, a 16th century correction house for women who would spin as part of their rehabilitation process. Someone once told me that they were convinced that the building was haunted, which reminded me of Avery Gordon’s work, Ghostly Matters, which deals sociologically with the lingering of ghosts and disappearances; “to be haunted is to be tied to social and historical effects” (Gordon 2008: 190). Sure, I miss the old tiled staircases and the student common room (now squatted and still running as a collective). But in the new building, I am learning to balance childcare with work, save for the small hiccups, growing pains, teething – the kinderziektes – such as when I couldn’t get into the nursing room at the beginning or loud drilling during lectures. But it has its plusses. I can work well in my office. It’s quiet for the most part. The social sciences are all in the same building. I have had more productive coffee-machine conversations with colleagues in the past two months than in a year. And the coffee isn’t bad.

In other, less personal news, we’ve just put together the program for our next Asian Borderlands conference, which should prove once again to be a fantastic group of papers and roundtables. I am looking forward to Hong Kong, the conference, and the discussions. I suppose I’m biased, but it truly is one of my favorite conferences. Plus, an idea to do a quick follow-up round of research is sparking again, now that one of the issues that I wrote about – the extension of the Lhasa railway down to Yatung/gro mo – has the green light. I have a fun pile of aeromobility related books in my office that I am excited about, and in a related vein, I also have just purchased Deb Cowen’s Deadly Life of Logistics. Now, to find the time to sit and read…

Yak tails box

Autumn Update and Some Musings on Academic Titles

Well now. Since I last posted, The Book has been published, hurrah. It’s been nice to receive some email responses as well as to hear through the grapevine that some reviews are in the works. There are a whole list of online places to find it (including alibaba and walmart [?!]), but it’s always nice to ask the library or the local bookshop to obtain a copy. I’ve since spotted a couple of silly translation errors, grr grr grr, but for the most part, it’s a satisfying feeling to finally have this monograph in hand.

The 4th Asian Borderlands Conference Call for Papers has now been posted (deadline 1 February 2014), with the theme, “Activated Borders: Reopenings, Ruptures, Relationships.” It will be held in Hong Kong in December of 2014, and so far, City University of Hong Kong has been fantastic in helping to organize the event. Looking forward to it already. I’ve also just applied for some funding to do a project on mobility and small international airports. It’s somewhat of a new direction for me, but I’m extremely excited about starting a fresh project. I sort of feel like my research is heading in a more coherent direction this time around. Or maybe it’s just because I’m getting older and I’m finding any kind of jargon more and more unpalatable.

Here’s a segue related to air mobility and border crossing: I travel to the UK a lot, and when I enter the aircraft, the flight attendant occasionally sees my title on my boarding pass and says something like, “Welcome DOCTOR Harris!,” to which someone behind me will sometimes comment, “Glad we have a doctor on board!” To which I end up replying, “Er, not that kind of doctor” – or when I’ve had a particularly difficult week, “Not the useful kind, I’m afraid.” This kind of exchange always calls to mind a story from a colleague in sociology, perhaps a little apocryphal, but certainly not unbelievable. During one long-haul flight, he was summoned on the PA system to head to the front of the plane. There he found a man in distress, assisted by a couple of flight attendants who looked relieved when he arrived. He suddenly realized that someone must have seen his “Dr.” title on the passenger list, and said it was the only time where he felt truly useless, and that he wasted his career. He also mentioned that the thought ran through his head that he only would have been able to help had it been a sociological emergency. It turned out that a medical doctor was on the plane as well, and my colleague was able to hold the person’s hand and talk to them until the MD arrived.

When I fill in my UK landing card, I have learned to write “lecturer”, as I am not a “professor” in the UK context. Yet I am a professor in the US, while “lecturer” normally refers to a non-tenure-track position. “Assistant professor” is the usual equivalent in North America, but in other international contexts I’ve been told that it sounds like you just assist the professor, “hold her briefcase or whatever.” And my official title in Dutch is Universitair Docent (UD), which translates to “university lecturer” in English, but is part of yet another complicated nation-specific system of institutional title-hierarchy. It also means that I don’t get to wear my puffy tasseled velvet 8-cornered hat and Dumbledore-y robe at a PhD defense (not that I mind). Only full professors get to do this in the Netherlands, whereas in the US, professors of all ranks often wear regalia for most graduation ceremonies. I don’t care so much about titles or regalia, but what I am interested in – and fascinated by – is international miscommunication based on the translations of titles. “Docent” in Dutch can translate as “Teacher” in English when it is a non-research tenure-track lecturing position, but I doubt that many UK or North American job applicants would apply for the job if they just saw it was for a “Teacher.” And, what’s further, if someone from the US is asked what they do for a living and they say they “teach,” this can apply to teaching anywhere, in a primary/elementary school all the way through postgraduate level. This is much less common in a UK context – you “teach” at a primary school, but “lecture” at a university.

Anyway, these are just some minor musings based on travelling between three different countries for both academic and family life. I’ve dug around a bit and found some articles that explain these situations a lot more succinctly, especially this guest blog post by Veronica Davidov on the Dutch academic job market on Karen Kelsky’s site “The Professor is In,” and a post on international academic titles on my favo(u)rite linguistics site by Lynne Murphy – “Separated By A Common Language,” concerning the differences between BrE and AmE.

mysterious surmount

Mid-March Mobilities

It’s “spring”. Yet there are still plenty of days where I cycle home from the office, hoping that the rain doesn’t turn into ice. It usually does. Cycling against the wind along a long stretch of cycle path with the little pellets of icy rain striking my face really hurts. But one of the many things I truly love about living in Amsterdam is the cycling, no matter what the weather is like. Cycling to pick up a bottle of wine, or to drop off the recycling, or to head to the train station, or to go out to a restaurant, or to shuttle singing children in a bakfiets to school, all helmet-less and unfazed and nonplussed. The ease and safety of cycling on dedicated bicycle lanes here in the Netherlands is actually deterring me from cycling when I am in NYC or London, at least until the infrastructure gets better and it is seen more as a regular mode of transport. This notion of an everyday cycling culture was discussed last Friday (see Manuel Stoffers’s great cycling history bibliography and a nice page of links to cycling) at a seminar that was probably the first gathering of mobilities scholars in the Netherlands. Other papers and projects involved mobile phone use in Cameroon, oil crises and sustainability, global deportation regimes, and my own thoughts on regional transport hubs as part of a new research project that I will discuss more of in the upcoming months. John Urry from Lancaster (who was also there) has a Centre for Mobilities Research and has just released a CFP for a very interesting-looking conference on Mobility Futures hosted by CeMoRe in September.

In other news, I am honoured to be a new member of the editorial board of Himalaya. It is really an excellent publication for anyone doing research in various academic disciplines related to the Himalayas (broadly-defined). It publishes reports from the field as well as dissertation abstracts, which are nice options for graduate students around the world looking to publish in international peer-reviewed journals. In even better news, rumour has it that they are working towards an open access situation, something that one of my favourite journals, Cultural Anthropology, has just committed to over the next year or so. I feel strongly about this, especially having spent time with brilliant scholars, researchers, and journalists in many parts of the world who do not have access to articles in journals trapped behind expensive paywalls.

 

 

November 2012: Antipode; AAArrghh

The good folks at Antipode have just made available a dialogue on “new academics in the neoliberal university” on their blog/website. I was a member of the SIGJ2 Writing Collective that wrote the first intervention and then the response to Culum Canally. Not to be biased, but I think it’s a productive discussion, and not at cross-purposes – it’s also wide open for much more debate. Comments are open; please join in.

http://antipodefoundation.org/2012/11/08/critical-dialogue-what-can-we-do-the-challenge-of-being-new-academics-in-neoliberal-universities/

It’s cold and drizzly out, and I’m swimming in the middle of a *lot* of teaching and grading. This could only mean one thing: it’s time for the AAA meetings. Heading off to SF next Wednesday, very excited about the topic of our panel on “Border Architectures”. Playing around with some new-old ideas on performance, fixed capital, and assemblages, but I have no solid idea where I’m headed yet. Hoping there will be people there to treat the panel more like a workshop than one of those traditional read-your-paper-then-leave kind of situations. Fingers crossed. For now, back to grading methods papers.

October 2012: Borderlands, New Publication, Neil

This website basically serves as a portal for updates on new publications, research projects, teaching, events, lectures…and the very occasional blog post.

I am jetlagged, up early (5am, very uncharacteristic), and writing from Singapore.  I’m here as part as the academic committee for the 3rd Asian Borderlands conference, held in conjunction with the Asia Research Institute, NUS, and the International Association for Asian Studies. We spent most of yesterday setting up the photo exhibition, a selection of images from the borderlands of Russia to Burma, taken by some of the participants – Dolly Kikon, Duncan McDuie-Ra, Makiko Kimura, and Martin Saxer.  It’s warm and muggy and thunderstormy, but a nice contrast to the chilly windy raininess of Amsterdam. And: the list of food eaten so far includes: BBQ squid, watermelon juice, fish ball soup, ice coffee in plastic bag. I plan to continue on this track.

Oh, there’s a Facebook page too, in case anyone likes to “like” Asian Borderlands.

Also this morning, I saw that Stuart Elden had posted the new issue of EPD: Society and Space (Vol 30, Issue 5). I’ve got an article in it, dealing with material culture, Marx, aprons, geography, and Tibet, the usual things I like. Except for aprons, perhaps.  See here: From loom to machine: Tibetan aprons and the configuration of place. It looks like a nice issue – I’m looking forward to reading the other papers.

There’s a particularly heartbreaking angle to this. The new EPD issue also arrives with a tribute to Neil Smith, who was a good friend and supervisor throughout graduate school – and, in fact, even before that.

A colleague suggested that I should run my potential graduate school plans by a friend of his, described as “Scottish, clever, and a hoot.”  The three of us met for a drink, Neil sang the Socialist ABC’s, and said I should consider the anthropology department were he was just hired at the time. So I did, and it was a great place to be challenged. Neil mentored like no other. So it’s weird and sad (and all sorts of other not-very-clever words because I don’t have the adequate vocabulary to express the exact emotion) to have an article in a journal that also has a tribute to someone who helped that very article come to fruition in so many ways, so much so that it went without saying to acknowledge him, and that hurts a bit.  So, for what it’s worth, this isn’t a long tribute (that might come later), but instead, some thought snippets in lieu of an acknowledgement:

A potential masters student came in to my office last week, and we had an satisfyingly intense talk about fear and insecurity at border checkpoints, of Dutch politics, and of hyphenated identities in the US.  The student asked if I had any tips for thesis-writing. I said, “don’t be afraid to be political.” But as soon as these words were out of my mouth, I knew that I had stolen them. These were the exact words that Neil used after reading a draft of my a chapter. I stopped short, upset.

Coming back from the BBQ squid stall last night in the thundery Singapore weather, a colleague and I were discussing cities without city centers, throwing out examples of urban areas with paltry public transport systems – only designed for wealthy commuters, ignoring whole sections of the city, reproducing inequality, etc. I found myself saying, “let’s talk to Neil about this” – and stopped short again.

All this to say that in retrospect, I suppose Neil wouldn’t want anyone to stop short at all. Perhaps the thing is to keep talking. So, Neil, friend, we will try our best to keep talking and not stopping. There’s more to say, but for now, I think the thing that can encourage one to not stop is to read the powerful comments from people who knew and were inspired by Neil in some form or other. This is lovely stuff.  There are comments on CUNY’s Center for Place, Culture, and Politics website (and here), a really great blog post by Tom Slater, open access papers now available from Society and Space and Antipode, and a call for us to create more loving futures. Hear hear.

Here’s Echo Beach by Martha and the Muffins on TOTP, mainly because Neil really liked this song, and it’s fun to remember him pogo-ing to it.